head to head · open source

authelia vs pocket-id

authelia has 29,010 GitHub stars, 1,485 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pocket-id has 9,222 stars, 310 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. authelia leads on adoption by 215% (29,010 vs 9,222 stars). authelia is written in Go under Apache-2.0; pocket-id is written in Go under BSD-2-Clause. authelia has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, pocket-id 3%. pocket-id was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (passkeys), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

authelia ★ 29K pocket-id ★ 9.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

authelia pocket-id
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 9.2K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 310
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick authelia if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full authelia profile →

pick pocket-id if

  • You want the pocket-id feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and pocket-id fits your workflow better

full pocket-id profile →

About authelia

Authelia is an open source authentication and authorization server written in Go that provides single sign on and multi factor authentication for web applications through a web portal, aimed at self hosters and platform teams who need to protect services sitting behind a reverse proxy.

read the full authelia overview →

About pocket-id

Pocket ID is a self hosted, OpenID Connect Certified™ and OAuth 2.0 provider, written in Go, that authenticates users with passkeys and passwords never, aimed at anyone who wants single sign on for their own applications without standing up a heavyweight identity platform.

read the full pocket-id overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

authelia vs Keycloak authelia vs JumpServer authelia vs Better Auth authelia vs Authentik authelia vs casbin authelia vs Sa-Token authelia vs hydra authelia vs SuperTokens authelia vs Zitadel authelia vs Logto authelia vs Ory authelia vs cas

Frequently asked questions

Is authelia or pocket-id more popular?

authelia has 29,010 GitHub stars and pocket-id has 9,222. authelia has the larger community by that measure.

Are authelia and pocket-id free?

Both are open source. authelia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pocket-id under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between authelia and pocket-id?

authelia is written in Go and pocket-id in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, authelia or pocket-id?

Choose authelia if you want the larger community (29,010 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pocket-id if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.