head to head · open source

authelia vs Zitadel

authelia has 29,010 GitHub stars, 1,485 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zitadel has 15,049 stars, 1,313 forks, 1,171 open issues and last shipped yesterday. authelia leads on adoption by 93% (29,010 vs 15,049 stars). authelia is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Zitadel is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. authelia has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Zitadel 9%. Zitadel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (2fa, authentication, mfa, oauth2), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

authelia ★ 29K Zitadel ★ 15K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

authelia Zitadel
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick authelia if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full authelia profile →

pick Zitadel if

  • You want the Zitadel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Zitadel fits your workflow better

full Zitadel profile →

About authelia

Authelia is an open source authentication and authorization server written in Go that provides single sign on and multi factor authentication for web applications through a web portal, aimed at self hosters and platform teams who need to protect services sitting behind a reverse proxy.

read the full authelia overview →

About Zitadel

Zitadel is an open source identity and access management platform written in Go and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It lives in the open source IAM ecosystem and provides identity infrastructure for developers who need to operate an authentication and authorization layer themselves.

read the full Zitadel overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

authelia vs Keycloak authelia vs JumpServer authelia vs Better Auth authelia vs Authentik authelia vs casbin authelia vs Sa-Token authelia vs hydra authelia vs SuperTokens authelia vs Logto authelia vs Ory authelia vs cas authelia vs dex

Frequently asked questions

Is authelia or Zitadel more popular?

authelia has 29,010 GitHub stars and Zitadel has 15,049. authelia has the larger community by that measure.

Are authelia and Zitadel free?

Both are open source. authelia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zitadel under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between authelia and Zitadel?

authelia is written in Go and Zitadel in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, authelia or Zitadel?

Choose authelia if you want the larger community (29,010 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Zitadel if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.