head to head · open source

authelia vs Sa-Token

authelia has 29,010 GitHub stars, 1,485 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sa-Token has 19,048 stars, 2,914 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. authelia leads on adoption by 52% (29,010 vs 19,048 stars). authelia is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Sa-Token is written in Java under Apache-2.0. authelia has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Sa-Token 15%. authelia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

authelia ★ 29K Sa-Token ★ 19K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

authelia Sa-Token
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 19K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick authelia if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full authelia profile →

pick Sa-Token if

  • You want the Sa-Token feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Sa-Token fits your workflow better

full Sa-Token profile →

About authelia

Authelia is an open source authentication and authorization server written in Go that provides single sign on and multi factor authentication for web applications through a web portal, aimed at self hosters and platform teams who need to protect services sitting behind a reverse proxy.

read the full authelia overview →

About Sa-Token

Sa Token is a free, open source, one stop Java authentication and authorization framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, that gives Java and Spring Boot developers login authentication, permission checks, distributed sessions, single sign on, OAuth2.0, gateway authentication, JWT integration, API key authorization and API parameter signing from a single dependency.

read the full Sa-Token overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

authelia vs Keycloak authelia vs JumpServer authelia vs Better Auth authelia vs Authentik authelia vs casbin authelia vs hydra authelia vs SuperTokens authelia vs Zitadel authelia vs Logto authelia vs Ory authelia vs cas authelia vs dex

Frequently asked questions

Is authelia or Sa-Token more popular?

authelia has 29,010 GitHub stars and Sa-Token has 19,048. authelia has the larger community by that measure.

Are authelia and Sa-Token free?

Both are open source. authelia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Sa-Token under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between authelia and Sa-Token?

authelia is written in Go and Sa-Token in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, authelia or Sa-Token?

Choose authelia if you want the larger community (29,010 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Sa-Token if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.