head to head · open source

archify vs runtime

archify has 77,662 GitHub stars, 5,220 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. runtime has 1,677 stars, 461 forks, 212 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. archify leads on adoption by 4,531% (77,662 vs 1,677 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; runtime is written in Go under Apache-2.0. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, runtime 27%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 78K runtime ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify runtime
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 1.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 461
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick runtime if

  • You want the runtime feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and runtime fits your workflow better

full runtime profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About runtime

E2B Runtime is the open source Go backend — control plane, Firecracker orchestrator, in VM agent, edge router, and template builder — that powers E2B's AI agent cloud and can be run by anyone on their own hardware.

read the full runtime overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 273K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs herdr archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or runtime more popular?

archify has 77,662 GitHub stars and runtime has 1,677. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and runtime free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and runtime under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and runtime?

archify is written in JavaScript and runtime in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or runtime?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (77,662 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose runtime if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.