head to head · open source

archify vs Hexabot

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars, 4,517 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hexabot has 1,232 stars, 240 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. archify leads on adoption by 5,390% (67,632 vs 1,232 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; Hexabot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Hexabot 19%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 68K Hexabot ★ 1.2K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify Hexabot
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 1.2K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 4.5K ⑂ 240
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick Hexabot if

  • You want the Hexabot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Hexabot fits your workflow better

full Hexabot profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About Hexabot

Hexabot is a self hosted TypeScript automation platform that builds and runs AI agents and agentic workflows across conversational channels, aimed at developers and teams who want agentic automation running on their own infrastructure rather than on a vendor hosted service.

read the full Hexabot overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools archify vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or Hexabot more popular?

archify has 67,632 GitHub stars and Hexabot has 1,232. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and Hexabot free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT, and Hexabot has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between archify and Hexabot?

archify is written in JavaScript and Hexabot in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or Hexabot?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (67,632 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Hexabot if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.