head to head · open source
archify vs Graft
archify has 79,373 GitHub stars, 5,320 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. Graft has 9,736 stars, 883 forks, 217 open issues and last shipped today. archify leads on adoption by 715% (79,373 vs 9,736 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; Graft is written in TypeScript under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Graft 9%. Graft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai-agents, claude-code, codex, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| archify | Graft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 79K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.3K | ⑂ 883 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick archify if
- You weight community size — 79K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Graft if
- You want the Graft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Graft fits your workflow better
About archify
Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.
read the full archify overview →
About Graft
Graft is an open source TypeScript CLI and MCP server that builds a readable, file based knowledge graph of your repository so coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Gemini start each task already oriented instead of re exploring the code from scratch.
read the full Graft overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Frameworks & Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is archify or Graft more popular?
archify has 79,373 GitHub stars and Graft has 9,736. archify has the larger community by that measure.
Are archify and Graft free?
Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and Graft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between archify and Graft?
archify is written in JavaScript and Graft in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, archify or Graft?
Choose archify if you want the larger community (79,373 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Graft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.