head to head · open source
archify vs agentacct
archify has 92,701 GitHub stars, 6,329 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agentacct has 757 stars, 80 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. archify leads on adoption by 12,146% (92,701 vs 757 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; agentacct is written in Python under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, agentacct 11%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai-agents, claude-code, codex, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| archify | agentacct | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 757 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.3K | ⑂ 80 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick archify if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agentacct if
- You want the agentacct feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and agentacct fits your workflow better
About archify
English · 简体中文 Archify Turn a codebase or system description into a polished, interactive system map — directly in chat. Archify is a Node.js rendering and validation system for Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode. Agents produce typed JSON IR; Archify deterministically compiles it into HTML/SVG. Open it and present — five diagram types, four presets, dark/light themes, built in brand marks, and finite motion Review architecture changes before merge — compare two validated snapshots as Before / Delta / After, with exact added, removed, changed, moved, and rerouted facts Every interaction stays grounded…
read the full archify overview →
About agentacct
agentacct English · 简体中文 agentacct answers one simple question: what the fuck are my agents actually doing? See what your coding agents have been working on, across projects and clients: recent activity, tool calls, recorded steps, checks, tokens, and estimated cost. Open a task for its Work Receipt and follow the activity timeline from attempt to result. Built from the local session logs of Claude Code, Codex, Kimi Code, OpenCode, Hermes, and others. No account, no cloud, nothing leaves your computer. Screenshots show a synthetic demo workspace; your install renders your own local data. Install Requires Python…
read the full agentacct overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Frameworks & Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is archify or agentacct more popular?
archify has 92,701 GitHub stars and agentacct has 757. archify has the larger community by that measure.
Are archify and agentacct free?
Both are open source. archify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and agentacct under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between archify and agentacct?
archify is written in JavaScript and agentacct in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, archify or agentacct?
Choose archify if you want the larger community (92,701 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose agentacct if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.