head to head · open source

Apache APISIX vs swag

Apache APISIX has 17,135 GitHub stars, 2,946 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. swag has 13,024 stars, 1,547 forks, 476 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Apache APISIX leads on adoption by 32% (17,135 vs 13,024 stars). Apache APISIX is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; swag is written in Go under MIT. Apache APISIX has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, swag 12%. Apache APISIX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache APISIX ★ 17K swag ★ 13K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache APISIX swag
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Lua Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache APISIX if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache APISIX profile →

pick swag if

  • You want the swag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and swag fits your workflow better

full swag profile →

About Apache APISIX

Apache APISIX is a dynamic, real time, high performance API gateway and AI gateway built on NGINX and etcd. It provides rich traffic management features, such as load balancing, dynamic upstream, canary release, circuit breaking, authentication, and observability. The project lives in the Lua and LuaJIT ecosystem, and it uses the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full Apache APISIX overview →

About swag

Swag is a command line tool that converts Go source annotations into Swagger 2.0 documentation. It lives in the Go ecosystem, is distributed under the MIT license, and is maintained by the swaggo organization. The project has been active for nine years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026, and it carries roughly 13,000 stars and 1,545 forks on GitHub.

read the full swag overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Apache APISIX vs fastapi Apache APISIX vs Hoppscotch Apache APISIX vs Bruno Apache APISIX vs Insomnia Apache APISIX vs one-api Apache APISIX vs OpenAPI-Specification Apache APISIX vs openapi-generator Apache APISIX vs redoc Apache APISIX vs SafeLine Apache APISIX vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Apache APISIX vs grpc-gateway Apache APISIX vs Yaak

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache APISIX or swag more popular?

Apache APISIX has 17,135 GitHub stars and swag has 13,024. Apache APISIX has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache APISIX and swag free?

Both are open source. Apache APISIX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and swag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Apache APISIX and swag?

Apache APISIX is written in Lua and swag in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache APISIX or swag?

Choose Apache APISIX if you want the larger community (17,135 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose swag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.