head to head · open source

fastapi vs Apache APISIX

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars, 9,903 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Apache APISIX has 17,135 stars, 2,946 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fastapi leads on adoption by 498% (102,402 vs 17,135 stars). fastapi is written in Python under MIT; Apache APISIX is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. fastapi has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Apache APISIX 17%. Apache APISIX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (api), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

fastapi ★ 102K Apache APISIX ★ 17K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

fastapi Apache APISIX
GitHub stars ★ 102K ★ 17K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Lua
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.9K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick fastapi if

  • You weight community size — 102K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full fastapi profile →

pick Apache APISIX if

  • You want the Apache APISIX feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and Apache APISIX fits your workflow better

full Apache APISIX profile →

About fastapi

FastAPI is an MIT licensed, high performance Python web framework for building APIs with standard Python type hints, aimed at Python developers and teams that need production ready HTTP services with automatic OpenAPI documentation.

read the full fastapi overview →

About Apache APISIX

Apache APISIX is a dynamic, real time, high performance API gateway and AI gateway built on NGINX and etcd. It provides rich traffic management features, such as load balancing, dynamic upstream, canary release, circuit breaking, authentication, and observability. The project lives in the Lua and LuaJIT ecosystem, and it uses the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full Apache APISIX overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

fastapi vs Hoppscotch fastapi vs Bruno fastapi vs Insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs OpenAPI-Specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc fastapi vs SafeLine fastapi vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF fastapi vs grpc-gateway fastapi vs Yaak fastapi vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is fastapi or Apache APISIX more popular?

fastapi has 102,402 GitHub stars and Apache APISIX has 17,135. fastapi has the larger community by that measure.

Are fastapi and Apache APISIX free?

Both are open source. fastapi is licensed under MIT and Apache APISIX under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between fastapi and Apache APISIX?

fastapi is written in Python and Apache APISIX in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, fastapi or Apache APISIX?

Choose fastapi if you want the larger community (102,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Apache APISIX if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.