head to head · open source

amis vs sequential-workflow-designer

amis has 18,885 GitHub stars, 2,728 forks, 1,715 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483 stars, 151 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. amis leads on adoption by 1,173% (18,885 vs 1,483 stars). amis is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; sequential-workflow-designer is written in TypeScript under MIT. amis has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, sequential-workflow-designer 10%. sequential-workflow-designer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (lowcode, no-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

amis ★ 19K sequential-workflow-designer ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

amis sequential-workflow-designer
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 151
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick amis if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full amis profile →

pick sequential-workflow-designer if

  • You want the sequential-workflow-designer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and sequential-workflow-designer fits your workflow better

full sequential-workflow-designer profile →

About amis

文档(国内) 文档(国外) 可视化编辑器 amis admin 爱速搭 如流群:3395342 如流群2:5511067 前端低代码框架,通过 JSON 配置就能生成各种后台页面,极大减少开发成本,甚至可以不需要了解前端。 开发指南 以下是参与开发 amis 才需要看的,使用请看前面的文档。 如果 github 下载慢可以使用 gitee 上的镜像。 推荐使用 node 12/14/16。npm 7+, 因为用到了 workspaces 功能。 如果是开发编辑器,需要访问 测试 注意:本地修改代码后,执行测试用例( npm test workspaces )之前需要先执行 npm run build 完成编译,因为 jest 并不支持 TypeScript 发布版本 如何贡献 请使用分支开发,首先创建分支 git checkout b feat xxx 开发提交后使用 git push set upstream origin feat xxx 创建远程分支。 然后通过系统提示的 链接来提交 PR。 请采用 typescript 编写,所有合理的改动、新的公用渲染器、用例或者文档的提交都会被接收。 贡献者 低代码平台 amis 只能实现前端低代码,如果需要完整的低代码平台推荐使用爱速搭。

read the full amis overview →

About sequential-workflow-designer

Sequential Workflow Designer A sequential workflow designer with no external dependencies for web applications. It is written in pure TypeScript and uses SVG for rendering. This designer is not associated with any workflow engine; it is fully generic. You can use it to create any kind of application, from graphical programming languages to workflow builders. Features: No external dependencies Fully generic and configurable Supports light, dark, and soft themes, with easy customization Compatible with modern browsers and mobile devices Definitions are stored as JSON Supports Angular, React and Svelte. 📝 Check…

read the full sequential-workflow-designer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Frequently asked questions

Is amis or sequential-workflow-designer more popular?

amis has 18,885 GitHub stars and sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483. amis has the larger community by that measure.

Are amis and sequential-workflow-designer free?

Both are open source. amis is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sequential-workflow-designer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between amis and sequential-workflow-designer?

amis is written in TypeScript and sequential-workflow-designer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, amis or sequential-workflow-designer?

Choose amis if you want the larger community (18,885 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sequential-workflow-designer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.