head to head · open source

amis vs flowgram.ai

amis has 18,894 GitHub stars, 2,736 forks, 1,715 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. flowgram.ai has 8,457 stars, 769 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. amis leads on adoption by 123% (18,894 vs 8,457 stars). amis is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. amis has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. flowgram.ai was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (no-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

amis ★ 19K flowgram.ai ★ 8.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

amis flowgram.ai
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 8.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-03-18 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 769
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick amis if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full amis profile →

pick flowgram.ai if

  • You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better

full flowgram.ai profile →

About amis

amis is an Apache 2.0 licensed front end low code framework from Baidu that generates admin and back office pages from JSON configuration, aimed at teams that want such interfaces without writing front end code by hand.

read the full amis overview →

About flowgram.ai

FlowGram is an MIT licensed TypeScript framework and toolkit that gives developers a free or fixed layout canvas, a node configuration form engine, a variable scope chain, and ready to use materials such as LLM, Condition, and Code Editor nodes so they can build their own AI workflow platforms faster and simpler.

read the full flowgram.ai overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

amis vs n8n amis vs ProxmoxVE amis vs ActivePieces amis vs LiveKit amis vs Windmill amis vs Botpress amis vs mitosis amis vs Automatisch amis vs puck amis vs Typebot amis vs cadence amis vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is amis or flowgram.ai more popular?

amis has 18,894 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,457. amis has the larger community by that measure.

Are amis and flowgram.ai free?

Both are open source. amis is licensed under Apache-2.0 and flowgram.ai under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between amis and flowgram.ai?

amis is written in TypeScript and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, amis or flowgram.ai?

Choose amis if you want the larger community (18,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.