head to head · open source

PocketBase vs Alokai

PocketBase has 61,103 GitHub stars, 3,694 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Alokai has 10,944 stars, 2,064 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. PocketBase leads on adoption by 458% (61,103 vs 10,944 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; Alokai is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Alokai 19%. PocketBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K Alokai ★ 11K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase Alokai
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 11K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-09
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick Alokai if

  • You want the Alokai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You evaluated both and Alokai fits your workflow better

full Alokai profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About Alokai

Alokai is an open source ecosystem of developer tools and a Frontend as a Service solution for composable commerce. It lives in the headless commerce ecosystem, where ecommerce backends expose APIs and separate frontend applications deliver storefronts.

read the full Alokai overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs ECC PocketBase vs react PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs puppeteer PocketBase vs archify PocketBase vs i-have-adhd PocketBase vs codebase-memory-mcp PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs it-tools PocketBase vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or Alokai more popular?

PocketBase has 61,103 GitHub stars and Alokai has 10,944. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and Alokai free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT, and Alokai has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between PocketBase and Alokai?

PocketBase is written in Go and Alokai in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or Alokai?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,103 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Alokai if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.