head to head · open source

akto vs h5i

akto has 1,518 GitHub stars, 292 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. h5i has 648 stars, 65 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped today. akto leads on adoption by 134% (1,518 vs 648 stars). akto is written in Java under MIT; h5i is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. akto has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, h5i 10%. h5i was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

akto ★ 1.5K h5i ★ 648 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

akto h5i
GitHub stars ★ 1.5K ★ 648
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 292 ⑂ 65
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick akto if

  • You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full akto profile →

pick h5i if

  • You want the h5i feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and h5i fits your workflow better

full h5i profile →

About akto

Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.

read the full akto overview →

About h5i

h5i (pronounced high five) is a lightweight, pure Rust browser built for AI agents to automate web pages and control HTTP traffic directly, so autonomous application testing stays sandboxed, in scope, and auditable.

read the full h5i overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs garak strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

akto vs strix akto vs shannon akto vs SkillSpector akto vs iFixAi akto vs codex-security akto vs garak akto vs AI-Infra-Guard akto vs giskard-oss akto vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter akto vs nono akto vs CyberStrike akto vs AiSOC

Frequently asked questions

Is akto or h5i more popular?

akto has 1,518 GitHub stars and h5i has 648. akto has the larger community by that measure.

Are akto and h5i free?

Both are open source. akto is licensed under MIT and h5i under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between akto and h5i?

akto is written in Java and h5i in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, akto or h5i?

Choose akto if you want the larger community (1,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose h5i if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.