head to head · open source

garak vs akto

garak has 9,308 GitHub stars, 1,294 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. akto has 1,518 stars, 292 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. garak leads on adoption by 513% (9,308 vs 1,518 stars). garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0; akto is written in Java under MIT. garak has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, akto 19%. akto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

garak ★ 9.3K akto ★ 1.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

garak akto
GitHub stars ★ 9.3K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 292
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick garak if

  • You weight community size — 9.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full garak profile →

pick akto if

  • You want the akto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and akto fits your workflow better

full akto profile →

About garak

garak is a free, Apache 2.0 command line vulnerability scanner for large language models that probes generative AI systems for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, and jailbreaks, and it is aimed at security engineers, red teamers, and AI developers who need to test the models they ship.

read the full garak overview →

About akto

Akto is an open source Java project under the MIT license. Its metadata presents it as an AI security platform for teams that secure AI agents, MCPs, LLMs, Agent skills, and Gen AI apps, while its README describes it as an open source API security platform. It lives in the open source API security and AI security ecosystem.

read the full akto overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

strix vs garak strix vs shannon strix vs skillspector strix vs ifixai strix vs codex-security strix vs ai-infra-guard strix vs giskard-oss strix vs agentic-bug-hunter openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.

garak vs strix garak vs shannon garak vs SkillSpector garak vs iFixAi garak vs codex-security garak vs AI-Infra-Guard garak vs giskard-oss garak vs Agentic-Bug-Hunter garak vs nono garak vs CyberStrike garak vs AiSOC garak vs pentest-ai-agents

Frequently asked questions

Is garak or akto more popular?

garak has 9,308 GitHub stars and akto has 1,518. garak has the larger community by that measure.

Are garak and akto free?

Both are open source. garak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and akto under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between garak and akto?

garak is written in Python and akto in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, garak or akto?

Choose garak if you want the larger community (9,308 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose akto if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.