head to head · open source

airgorah vs pika

airgorah has 3,679 GitHub stars, 629 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. pika has 635 stars, 84 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. airgorah leads on adoption by 479% (3,679 vs 635 stars). airgorah is written in Rust under MIT; pika is written in Go under Apache-2.0. airgorah has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, pika 13%. pika was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (security-audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

airgorah ★ 3.7K pika ★ 635 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

airgorah pika
GitHub stars ★ 3.7K ★ 635
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 629 ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick airgorah if

  • You weight community size — 3.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full airgorah profile →

pick pika if

  • You want the pika feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and pika fits your workflow better

full pika profile →

About airgorah

Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.

read the full airgorah overview →

About pika

Pika is a lightweight probe monitoring system written in Go that gives operators real time infrastructure metrics alongside security auditing and tamper protection in one self hosted package.

read the full pika overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K Keycloak ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

airgorah vs PayloadsAllTheThings airgorah vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills airgorah vs ProjectDiscovery airgorah vs pentagi airgorah vs PentestGPT airgorah vs crowdsec airgorah vs Osintgram airgorah vs thc-hydra airgorah vs vuls airgorah vs osv-scanner airgorah vs rengine airgorah vs reconftw

Frequently asked questions

Is airgorah or pika more popular?

airgorah has 3,679 GitHub stars and pika has 635. airgorah has the larger community by that measure.

Are airgorah and pika free?

Both are open source. airgorah is licensed under MIT and pika under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between airgorah and pika?

airgorah is written in Rust and pika in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, airgorah or pika?

Choose airgorah if you want the larger community (3,679 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pika if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.