head to head · open source

pentagi vs airgorah

pentagi has 24,766 GitHub stars, 3,186 forks, 71 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. airgorah has 3,536 stars, 595 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pentagi leads on adoption by 600% (24,766 vs 3,536 stars). pentagi is written in Go under MIT; airgorah is written in Rust under MIT. pentagi has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, airgorah 17%. airgorah was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pentagi ★ 25K airgorah ★ 3.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pentagi airgorah
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 3.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 595
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pentagi if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pentagi profile →

pick airgorah if

  • You want the airgorah feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and airgorah fits your workflow better

full airgorah profile →

About pentagi

PentAGI is an MIT licensed, self hosted multi agent system written in Go that runs fully autonomous AI agents to perform complex penetration testing tasks inside an isolated Docker sandbox, built for information security professionals, researchers, and enthusiasts.

read the full pentagi overview →

About airgorah

Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.

read the full airgorah overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

pentagi vs PayloadsAllTheThings pentagi vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills pentagi vs ProjectDiscovery pentagi vs PentestGPT pentagi vs Osintgram pentagi vs vuls pentagi vs osv-scanner pentagi vs Nettacker pentagi vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool pentagi vs afrog pentagi vs Raccoon pentagi vs Tracecat

Frequently asked questions

Is pentagi or airgorah more popular?

pentagi has 24,766 GitHub stars and airgorah has 3,536. pentagi has the larger community by that measure.

Are pentagi and airgorah free?

Both are open source. pentagi is licensed under MIT and airgorah under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pentagi and airgorah?

pentagi is written in Go and airgorah in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pentagi or airgorah?

Choose pentagi if you want the larger community (24,766 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose airgorah if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.