head to head · open source
AI-Infra-Guard vs pipelock
AI-Infra-Guard has 7,373 GitHub stars, 733 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pipelock has 983 stars, 113 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AI-Infra-Guard leads on adoption by 650% (7,373 vs 983 stars). AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python under Apache-2.0; pipelock is written in Go under Apache-2.0. AI-Infra-Guard has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, pipelock 11%. pipelock was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (agent-security, ai-security, llm-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AI-Infra-Guard | pipelock | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.4K | ★ 983 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 733 | ⑂ 113 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AI-Infra-Guard if
- You weight community size — 7.4K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pipelock if
- You want the pipelock feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and pipelock fits your workflow better
About AI-Infra-Guard
📖 Documentation 🌐 🇨🇳 中文 · 🇯🇵 日本語 · 🇪🇸 Español · 🇩🇪 Deutsch · 🇫🇷 Français · 🇰🇷 한국어 · 🇧🇷 Português · 🇷🇺 Русский 🚀 AI Red Teaming Platform by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI Infra Guard) integrates capabilities such as ClawScan(OpenClaw Security Scan), Agent Scan，AI infra vulnerability scan, MCP Server & Agent Skills scan, and Jailbreak Evaluation, aiming to provide users with the most comprehensive, intelligent, and user friendly solution for AI security risk self examination. We are committed to making A.I.G(AI Infra Guard) the industry leading AI red teaming platform. More stars help this project…
read the full AI-Infra-Guard overview →
About pipelock
Open source AI agent firewall for Verifiable Egress Control . Pipelock sits between AI agents and the network. It inspects mediated HTTP, WebSocket, MCP, and A2A traffic, plus CONNECT tunnel contents when TLS interception is enabled, for secret exfiltration, prompt injection, SSRF, tool poisoning, and risky tool call chains. Plain CONNECT without interception is scanned at the hostname and URL level. Configured MCP upstreams are an exception to private address SSRF blocking: local/private servers are allowed, but cloud metadata endpoints remain blocked. Pipelock emits mediator signed action receipts over content…
read the full pipelock overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AI-Infra-Guard or pipelock more popular?
AI-Infra-Guard has 7,373 GitHub stars and pipelock has 983. AI-Infra-Guard has the larger community by that measure.
Are AI-Infra-Guard and pipelock free?
Both are open source. AI-Infra-Guard is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pipelock under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AI-Infra-Guard and pipelock?
AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python and pipelock in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AI-Infra-Guard or pipelock?
Choose AI-Infra-Guard if you want the larger community (7,373 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pipelock if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.