head to head · open source
garak vs AI-Infra-Guard
garak has 9,850 GitHub stars, 1,439 forks, 429 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. AI-Infra-Guard has 7,373 stars, 733 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. garak leads on adoption by 34% (9,850 vs 7,373 stars). garak is written in Python under Apache-2.0; AI-Infra-Guard is written in Python under Apache-2.0. garak has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, AI-Infra-Guard 10%. AI-Infra-Guard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (llm-evaluation, llm-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| garak | AI-Infra-Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.8K | ★ 7.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 733 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick garak if
- You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AI-Infra-Guard if
- You want the AI-Infra-Guard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and AI-Infra-Guard fits your workflow better
About garak
garak, LLM vulnerability scanner Generative AI Red teaming & Assessment Kit garak checks if an LLM can be made to fail in a way we don't want. garak probes for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity generation, jailbreaks, and many other weaknesses. If you know nmap or msf / Metasploit Framework, garak does somewhat similar things to them, but for LLMs. garak focuses on ways of making an LLM or dialog system fail. It combines static, dynamic, and adaptive probes to explore this. garak 's a free tool. We love developing it and are always interested in adding functionality to…
read the full garak overview →
About AI-Infra-Guard
📖 Documentation 🌐 🇨🇳 中文 · 🇯🇵 日本語 · 🇪🇸 Español · 🇩🇪 Deutsch · 🇫🇷 Français · 🇰🇷 한국어 · 🇧🇷 Português · 🇷🇺 Русский 🚀 AI Red Teaming Platform by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI Infra Guard) integrates capabilities such as ClawScan(OpenClaw Security Scan), Agent Scan，AI infra vulnerability scan, MCP Server & Agent Skills scan, and Jailbreak Evaluation, aiming to provide users with the most comprehensive, intelligent, and user friendly solution for AI security risk self examination. We are committed to making A.I.G(AI Infra Guard) the industry leading AI red teaming platform. More stars help this project…
read the full AI-Infra-Guard overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is garak or AI-Infra-Guard more popular?
garak has 9,850 GitHub stars and AI-Infra-Guard has 7,373. garak has the larger community by that measure.
Are garak and AI-Infra-Guard free?
Both are open source. garak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and AI-Infra-Guard under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between garak and AI-Infra-Guard?
garak is written in Python and AI-Infra-Guard in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, garak or AI-Infra-Guard?
Choose garak if you want the larger community (9,850 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose AI-Infra-Guard if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.