head to head · open source

agentrq vs kandev

agentrq has 1,123 GitHub stars, 80 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. kandev has 815 stars, 123 forks, 116 open issues and last shipped today. agentrq leads on adoption by 38% (1,123 vs 815 stars). agentrq is written in Go under Apache-2.0; kandev is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. agentrq has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, kandev 15%. agentrq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agentic-ai, claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

agentrq ★ 1.1K kandev ★ 815 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

agentrq kandev
GitHub stars ★ 1.1K ★ 815
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 80 ⑂ 123
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick agentrq if

  • You weight community size — 1.1K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full agentrq profile →

pick kandev if

  • You want the kandev feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kandev fits your workflow better

full kandev profile →

About agentrq

AgentRQ is a self hosted, Apache 2.0 human in the loop task manager that gives human operators and AI agents one shared workspace over the Model Context Protocol, aimed at people who run their own Claude subscriptions or any agent harness with ACP support.

read the full agentrq overview →

About kandev

Kandev is an open source AI Kanban and development environment written in Go and licensed under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the developer tools and agentic AI ecosystem, providing a control plane for coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Devin, and Qwen.

read the full kandev overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

agentrq vs vibe-kanban agentrq vs Wekan agentrq vs qinglong agentrq vs edict agentrq vs OpenProject agentrq vs onedev agentrq vs Planka agentrq vs Leantime agentrq vs kanboard agentrq vs Kaneo agentrq vs ccpm agentrq vs Fizzy

Frequently asked questions

Is agentrq or kandev more popular?

agentrq has 1,123 GitHub stars and kandev has 815. agentrq has the larger community by that measure.

Are agentrq and kandev free?

Both are open source. agentrq is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kandev under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between agentrq and kandev?

agentrq is written in Go and kandev in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, agentrq or kandev?

Choose agentrq if you want the larger community (1,123 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose kandev if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.