head to head · open source

afrog vs npq

afrog has 4,424 GitHub stars, 483 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. npq has 1,796 stars, 43 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. afrog leads on adoption by 146% (4,424 vs 1,796 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; npq is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, npq 2%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

afrog ★ 4.4K npq ★ 1.8K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

afrog npq
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 1.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in HTML JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 483 ⑂ 43
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick afrog if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full afrog profile →

pick npq if

  • You want the npq feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and npq fits your workflow better

full npq profile →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

About npq

npq is a command line security tool that audits npm packages before they are installed, aimed at Node.js developers and supply chain security teams who want a pre install checkpoint rather than discovering a malicious or vulnerable dependency after its install scripts have already run.

read the full npq overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

afrog vs PayloadsAllTheThings afrog vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills afrog vs ProjectDiscovery afrog vs pentagi afrog vs PentestGPT afrog vs crowdsec afrog vs Osintgram afrog vs thc-hydra afrog vs vuls afrog vs osv-scanner afrog vs rengine afrog vs reconftw

Frequently asked questions

Is afrog or npq more popular?

afrog has 4,424 GitHub stars and npq has 1,796. afrog has the larger community by that measure.

Are afrog and npq free?

Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and npq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between afrog and npq?

afrog is written in HTML and npq in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, afrog or npq?

Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,424 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose npq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.