head to head · open source

afrog vs eraser

afrog has 4,425 GitHub stars, 483 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. eraser has 622 stars, 74 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped yesterday. afrog leads on adoption by 611% (4,425 vs 622 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; eraser is written in Go under Apache-2.0. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, eraser 12%. eraser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (vulnerability-scanner), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

afrog ★ 4.4K eraser ★ 622 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

afrog eraser
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 622
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in HTML Go
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 483 ⑂ 74
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick afrog if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full afrog profile →

pick eraser if

  • You want the eraser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and eraser fits your workflow better

full eraser profile →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

About eraser

Eraser is an Apache 2.0 licensed Kubernetes operator, written in Go, that helps Kubernetes administrators remove a list of non running container images from all nodes in a cluster.

read the full eraser overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

afrog vs PayloadsAllTheThings afrog vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills afrog vs ProjectDiscovery afrog vs pentagi afrog vs PentestGPT afrog vs crowdsec afrog vs Osintgram afrog vs thc-hydra afrog vs vuls afrog vs osv-scanner afrog vs rengine afrog vs reconftw

Frequently asked questions

Is afrog or eraser more popular?

afrog has 4,425 GitHub stars and eraser has 622. afrog has the larger community by that measure.

Are afrog and eraser free?

Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and eraser under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between afrog and eraser?

afrog is written in HTML and eraser in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, afrog or eraser?

Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,425 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose eraser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.