head to head · open source
afrog vs cve-lite-cli
afrog has 4,420 GitHub stars, 483 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cve-lite-cli has 740 stars, 153 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped yesterday. afrog leads on adoption by 497% (4,420 vs 740 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; cve-lite-cli is written in TypeScript under MIT. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, cve-lite-cli 21%. cve-lite-cli was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (vulnerability-scanner), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| afrog | cve-lite-cli | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.4K | ★ 740 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | HTML | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 483 | ⑂ 153 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick afrog if
- You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cve-lite-cli if
- You want the cve-lite-cli feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and cve-lite-cli fits your workflow better
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
About cve-lite-cli
CVE Lite CLI is an MIT licensed, OWASP Lab Project command line scanner that reads JavaScript and TypeScript lockfiles to find known dependency vulnerabilities, built for developers and platform teams who want fast local results in the terminal and a clean fit into CI.
read the full cve-lite-cli overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is afrog or cve-lite-cli more popular?
afrog has 4,420 GitHub stars and cve-lite-cli has 740. afrog has the larger community by that measure.
Are afrog and cve-lite-cli free?
Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and cve-lite-cli under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between afrog and cve-lite-cli?
afrog is written in HTML and cve-lite-cli in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, afrog or cve-lite-cli?
Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,420 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cve-lite-cli if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.