head to head · open source

afrog vs Artemis

afrog has 4,419 GitHub stars, 483 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Artemis has 1,230 stars, 145 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. afrog leads on adoption by 259% (4,419 vs 1,230 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; Artemis is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Artemis 12%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (vulnerability-scanner), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

afrog ★ 4.4K Artemis ★ 1.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

afrog Artemis
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 1.2K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in HTML Python
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 483 ⑂ 145
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick afrog if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full afrog profile →

pick Artemis if

  • You want the Artemis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Artemis fits your workflow better

full Artemis profile →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

About Artemis

Artemis is a modular, Python based vulnerability scanner with automatic report generation, built by CERT PL to check website security and turn findings into ready to send messages for the scanned organisations.

read the full Artemis overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

afrog vs PayloadsAllTheThings afrog vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills afrog vs ProjectDiscovery afrog vs pentagi afrog vs PentestGPT afrog vs Osintgram afrog vs thc-hydra afrog vs vuls afrog vs osv-scanner afrog vs rengine afrog vs reconftw afrog vs cve

Frequently asked questions

Is afrog or Artemis more popular?

afrog has 4,419 GitHub stars and Artemis has 1,230. afrog has the larger community by that measure.

Are afrog and Artemis free?

Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and Artemis under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between afrog and Artemis?

afrog is written in HTML and Artemis in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, afrog or Artemis?

Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,419 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Artemis if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.