head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs shesha-framework
ActivePieces has 25,364 GitHub stars, 4,428 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. shesha-framework has 514 stars, 144 forks, 430 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 4,835% (25,364 vs 514 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; shesha-framework is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, shesha-framework 28%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (workflow-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | shesha-framework | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 514 |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 144 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick shesha-framework if
- You want the shesha-framework feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and shesha-framework fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About shesha-framework
What is Shesha? Shesha is an open source Low Code development framework specifically for .NET developers. You can build anything from simple CRUD apps, admin panels to complex business applications super quickly. Shesha builds on top of other excellent frameworks and libraries (most notably ASP\.NET Core, Abp\.io, React, NextJs), layers on Low Code capabilities (think drag & drop form builder and app themer), and incorporates standard admin functionality (e.g. User and security management) to drastically reduce the time and effort required to build applications. In fact, in our experience, you will likely need…
read the full shesha-framework overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or shesha-framework more popular?
ActivePieces has 25,364 GitHub stars and shesha-framework has 514. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and shesha-framework free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and shesha-framework is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and shesha-framework?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and shesha-framework in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or shesha-framework?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,364 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose shesha-framework if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.