head to head · open source

ActivePieces vs saltcorn

ActivePieces has 24,584 GitHub stars, 4,214 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. saltcorn has 2,071 stars, 353 forks, 737 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 1,087% (24,584 vs 2,071 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; saltcorn is written in JavaScript under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, saltcorn 17%. saltcorn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ActivePieces ★ 25K saltcorn ★ 2.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ActivePieces saltcorn
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 2.1K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 353
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ActivePieces if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ActivePieces profile →

pick saltcorn if

  • You want the saltcorn feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and saltcorn fits your workflow better

full saltcorn profile →

About ActivePieces

ActivePieces is an open source, TypeScript based no code automation platform for building AI workflows and exposing integrations as MCP servers, aimed at both technical and non technical users who want Zapier style automation while keeping control of their own data.

read the full ActivePieces overview →

About saltcorn

Saltcorn is a free and open source no code application builder, licensed under MIT and written in JavaScript, for people who need to build database backed web and mobile applications without writing application code.

read the full saltcorn overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs activepieces n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

ActivePieces vs n8n ActivePieces vs ProxmoxVE ActivePieces vs LiveKit ActivePieces vs amis ActivePieces vs Windmill ActivePieces vs Botpress ActivePieces vs mitosis ActivePieces vs Automatisch ActivePieces vs puck ActivePieces vs Typebot ActivePieces vs cadence ActivePieces vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is ActivePieces or saltcorn more popular?

ActivePieces has 24,584 GitHub stars and saltcorn has 2,071. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.

Are ActivePieces and saltcorn free?

Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and saltcorn is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ActivePieces and saltcorn?

ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and saltcorn in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ActivePieces or saltcorn?

Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (24,584 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose saltcorn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.