head to head · open source

ActivePieces vs magic

ActivePieces has 25,364 GitHub stars, 4,428 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magic has 1,220 stars, 178 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 1,979% (25,364 vs 1,220 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; magic is written in C# under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ActivePieces ★ 25K magic ★ 1.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ActivePieces magic
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 1.2K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 178
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ActivePieces if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ActivePieces profile →

pick magic if

  • You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better

full magic profile →

About ActivePieces

An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…

read the full ActivePieces overview →

About magic

Instant SECURE Full Stack Apps and AI Agents Turn plain English into a working full stack app — database, secure API, business logic, and frontend — running on your own hardware , with zero lock in . An open source alternative to Lovable, Bolt, and Replit that gives you the whole backend, plus an MCP server that turns every endpoint into a tool for Claude, Cursor, or Codex. Read more about Hyperlambda. [ ] Run it in 60 seconds Then open localhost:5555 , point it at localhost:4444 , and log in with root / root . Point the API Wizard at your database, and it generates a complete, secured REST API — then extend it…

read the full magic overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Frequently asked questions

Is ActivePieces or magic more popular?

ActivePieces has 25,364 GitHub stars and magic has 1,220. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.

Are ActivePieces and magic free?

Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and magic is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ActivePieces and magic?

ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ActivePieces or magic?

Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,364 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.