head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs local-deep-research
ActivePieces has 24,584 GitHub stars, 4,214 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. local-deep-research has 9,109 stars, 824 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 170% (24,584 vs 9,109 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, local-deep-research 9%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | local-deep-research | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 9.1K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 824 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick local-deep-research if
- You want the local-deep-research feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and local-deep-research fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
ActivePieces is an open source, TypeScript based no code automation platform for building AI workflows and exposing integrations as MCP servers, aimed at both technical and non technical users who want Zapier style automation while keeping control of their own data.
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research is an MIT licensed, Python based AI research assistant that performs deep, agentic research with proper citations across any local or cloud LLM and more than ten search engines, built for researchers, developers, and privacy conscious self hosters who want both the workload and the data to stay on hardware they control.
read the full local-deep-research overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or local-deep-research more popular?
ActivePieces has 24,584 GitHub stars and local-deep-research has 9,109. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and local-deep-research free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and local-deep-research is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and local-deep-research?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and local-deep-research in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or local-deep-research?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (24,584 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose local-deep-research if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.