head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs coco
ActivePieces has 25,400 GitHub stars, 4,441 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. coco has 628 stars, 14 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 3,945% (25,400 vs 628 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; coco is written in Python under Apache-2.0. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, coco 2%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | coco | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 628 |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 14 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick coco if
- You want the coco feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and coco fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About coco
Coco Super Intelligence 495 personas across 13 departments, 229 skills [^installed] and 388 commands in the full catalog (coco 1.9.0, 2026 10 21). Agent skills, slash commands and subagents for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and other AI coding agents. One command installs them into the tool you already use. Coco's files and state stay on your machine. Your coding agent still uses its own model provider. Open core: the core is Apache 2.0, and Super Intelligence is proprietary. Relicensed from MIT to Apache 2.0 from 2026 11 05. Earlier releases remain under MIT. Files stay on your machine. No telemetry. A version…
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or coco more popular?
ActivePieces has 25,400 GitHub stars and coco has 628. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and coco free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and coco is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and coco?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and coco in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or coco?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,400 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose coco if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.