head to head · open source

ActivePieces vs cenit

ActivePieces has 24,584 GitHub stars, 4,214 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cenit has 503 stars, 133 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 4,787% (24,584 vs 503 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; cenit is written in Ruby under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, cenit 26%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ActivePieces ★ 25K cenit ★ 503 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ActivePieces cenit
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 503
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-29
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 133
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ActivePieces if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ActivePieces profile →

pick cenit if

  • You want the cenit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and cenit fits your workflow better

full cenit profile →

About ActivePieces

ActivePieces is an open source, TypeScript based no code automation platform for building AI workflows and exposing integrations as MCP servers, aimed at both technical and non technical users who want Zapier style automation while keeping control of their own data.

read the full ActivePieces overview →

About cenit

Cenit is a 100% open source integration platform as a service (iPaaS) written in Ruby, built for teams that design integrations, orchestrate data flows, expose APIs, and manage data pipelines across external systems without adopting a closed hosted vendor.

read the full cenit overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs activepieces n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

ActivePieces vs n8n ActivePieces vs ProxmoxVE ActivePieces vs LiveKit ActivePieces vs amis ActivePieces vs Windmill ActivePieces vs Botpress ActivePieces vs mitosis ActivePieces vs Automatisch ActivePieces vs puck ActivePieces vs Typebot ActivePieces vs cadence ActivePieces vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is ActivePieces or cenit more popular?

ActivePieces has 24,584 GitHub stars and cenit has 503. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.

Are ActivePieces and cenit free?

Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and cenit is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ActivePieces and cenit?

ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and cenit in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ActivePieces or cenit?

Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (24,584 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose cenit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.