head to head · open source
ActivePieces vs Auto-Company
ActivePieces has 25,409 GitHub stars, 4,441 forks, 573 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Auto-Company has 3,191 stars, 503 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. ActivePieces leads on adoption by 696% (25,409 vs 3,191 stars). ActivePieces is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Auto-Company is written in Python under MIT. ActivePieces has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Auto-Company 16%. ActivePieces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, workflow-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivePieces | Auto-Company | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 3.2K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-07 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 503 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivePieces if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Auto-Company if
- You want the Auto-Company feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Auto-Company fits your workflow better
About ActivePieces
An open source replacement for Zapier Documentation 🌪️ Create a Piece 🖉 Deploy 🔥 Join Discord 🤯 Welcome to Activepieces All in one AI automation designed to be extensible through a type safe pieces framework written in TypeScript . When you contribute pieces to Activepieces they become automatically available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs through Claude Desktop, Cursor or Windsurf! 🔥 Why Activepieces is Different: 💖 Loved by Everyone : Intuitive interface and great experience for both technical and non technical users with a quick learning curve. 🌐 Open Ecosystem: All pieces are open source…
read the full ActivePieces overview →
About Auto-Company
Auto Company A fully autonomous AI company running 24/7 Powered by Agentic Workflows , this project orchestrates 14 Autonomous AI Agents , each modeled after world class experts in their domain. They ideate products, make decisions, write code, deploy, and market without human intervention. Powered by Claude Code (default) and Codex CLI on macOS + Windows/WSL, with a local dashboard on both hosts. Optional Cursor and OpenAI compatible adapters require explicit configuration. See the adapter guide for their capabilities and limits. Dashboard Preview Four real ScopeFence product cycles: 04 is expanded; 03, 02 and…
read the full Auto-Company overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivePieces or Auto-Company more popular?
ActivePieces has 25,409 GitHub stars and Auto-Company has 3,191. ActivePieces has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivePieces and Auto-Company free?
Both are open source. ActivePieces has no licence declared in this registry, and Auto-Company is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between ActivePieces and Auto-Company?
ActivePieces is written in TypeScript and Auto-Company in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivePieces or Auto-Company?
Choose ActivePieces if you want the larger community (25,409 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Auto-Company if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.