head to head · open source

Zulip vs mirotalk

Zulip has 25,921 GitHub stars, 10,247 forks, 2,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mirotalk has 4,739 stars, 773 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Zulip leads on adoption by 447% (25,921 vs 4,739 stars). Zulip is written in Python under Apache-2.0; mirotalk is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Zulip has attracted 40% as many forks as stars, mirotalk 16%. Zulip was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (collaboration, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zulip ★ 26K mirotalk ★ 4.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zulip mirotalk
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 4.7K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 773
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zulip if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zulip profile →

pick mirotalk if

  • You want the mirotalk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and mirotalk fits your workflow better

full mirotalk profile →

About Zulip

Zulip is an open source organized team chat application built on topic based threading, aimed at distributed teams that need live and asynchronous conversation in one place, and it is positioned as an open alternative to Slack.

read the full Zulip overview →

About mirotalk

MiroTalk P2P is a free, open source, self hosted video conferencing platform that connects participants through direct peer to peer WebRTC links, aimed at teams and organisations that want browser based meeting rooms running on their own infrastructure.

read the full mirotalk overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs zulip plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Zulip vs Plane Zulip vs Rocket.Chat Zulip vs cobalt Zulip vs Buzz Zulip vs Jitsi Zulip vs srs Zulip vs Huly Zulip vs etherpad Zulip vs drawnix Zulip vs univer Zulip vs chat Zulip vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Zulip or mirotalk more popular?

Zulip has 25,921 GitHub stars and mirotalk has 4,739. Zulip has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zulip and mirotalk free?

Both are open source. Zulip is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mirotalk under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zulip and mirotalk?

Zulip is written in Python and mirotalk in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zulip or mirotalk?

Choose Zulip if you want the larger community (25,921 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mirotalk if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.