head to head · open source

Zen Browser vs percy

Zen Browser has 44,504 GitHub stars, 1,760 forks, 689 open issues and last shipped yesterday. percy has 2,315 stars, 84 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. Zen Browser leads on adoption by 1,822% (44,504 vs 2,315 stars). Zen Browser is written in C++ under MPL-2.0; percy is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Zen Browser has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, percy 4%. Zen Browser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zen Browser ★ 45K percy ★ 2.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zen Browser percy
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 2.3K
License MPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zen Browser if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zen Browser profile →

pick percy if

  • You want the percy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and percy fits your workflow better

full percy profile →

About Zen Browser

Zen Browser is a privacy focused, open source web browser built on Firefox’s Gecko engine. It inherits Firefox’s compatibility and extension ecosystem while introducing a streamlined interface and productivity oriented features. The project lives in the desktop browser ecosystem, targeting users who want a Firefox based experience with reduced clutter and enhanced customization.

read the full Zen Browser overview →

About percy

Percy is a Rust library and build workflow for creating frontend browser applications that compile to WebAssembly, with support for server side rendering, aimed at Rust developers who want to write client side, server side, or isomorphic web apps without leaving Rust.

read the full percy overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Zen Browser vs uBlock Zen Browser vs Ladybird Zen Browser vs chrome-devtools-mcp Zen Browser vs monaco-editor Zen Browser vs servo Zen Browser vs serenity Zen Browser vs refined-github Zen Browser vs slate Zen Browser vs Avalonia Zen Browser vs webtorrent Zen Browser vs fingerprintjs Zen Browser vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Zen Browser or percy more popular?

Zen Browser has 44,504 GitHub stars and percy has 2,315. Zen Browser has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zen Browser and percy free?

Both are open source. Zen Browser is licensed under MPL-2.0 and percy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zen Browser and percy?

Zen Browser is written in C++ and percy in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zen Browser or percy?

Choose Zen Browser if you want the larger community (44,504 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose percy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.