head to head · open source

Jitsi vs xyne-spaces

Jitsi has 29,969 GitHub stars, 8,041 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped today. xyne-spaces has 684 stars, 527 forks, 514 open issues and last shipped today. Jitsi leads on adoption by 4,281% (29,969 vs 684 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; xyne-spaces is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, xyne-spaces 77%. xyne-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsi ★ 30K xyne-spaces ★ 684 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsi xyne-spaces
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 684
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 8.0K ⑂ 527
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsi if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsi profile →

pick xyne-spaces if

  • You want the xyne-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xyne-spaces fits your workflow better

full xyne-spaces profile →

About Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.

read the full Jitsi overview →

About xyne-spaces

Xyne Spaces is an open source "AI Org OS" — an Apache 2.0, TypeScript collaboration platform that keeps an organization's context in one permission aware store and serves it back to both people and AI agents, making it a fit for teams that want human and agent work running over the same company knowledge rather than across a dozen disconnected tools.

read the full xyne-spaces overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

plane vs jitsi plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Jitsi vs Plane Jitsi vs Rocket.Chat Jitsi vs cobalt Jitsi vs Buzz Jitsi vs srs Jitsi vs Huly Jitsi vs Zulip Jitsi vs etherpad Jitsi vs univer Jitsi vs drawnix Jitsi vs chat Jitsi vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi or xyne-spaces more popular?

Jitsi has 29,969 GitHub stars and xyne-spaces has 684. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsi and xyne-spaces free?

Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and xyne-spaces under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jitsi and xyne-spaces?

Jitsi is written in TypeScript and xyne-spaces in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsi or xyne-spaces?

Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,969 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose xyne-spaces if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.