head to head · open source

wiki vs Raneto

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped today. Raneto has 2,902 stars, 438 forks, 91 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. wiki leads on adoption by 897% (28,938 vs 2,902 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; Raneto is written in JavaScript under MIT. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Raneto 15%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (markdown, wiki), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K Raneto ★ 2.9K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki Raneto
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.9K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Vue JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-03-18
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 438
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick Raneto if

  • You want the Raneto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Raneto fits your workflow better

full Raneto profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About Raneto

Raneto Raneto is a free, open, simple Markdown powered knowledge base for Node.js. Find out more → Live Demo → Documentation → Top Features All content is file based Search file names and contents Markdown editor in the browser Login system for edit protection Simple and Lightweight Mailing List Click here to join the mailing list for project news and important security alerts! Environment Variables Environment variables take the highest priority and override values set in config/config.js . License Report

read the full Raneto overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or Raneto more popular?

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars and Raneto has 2,902. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and Raneto free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Raneto under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and Raneto?

wiki is written in Vue and Raneto in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or Raneto?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,938 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Raneto if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.