head to head · open source

wiki vs OpenContext

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped today. OpenContext has 1,180 stars, 75 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. wiki leads on adoption by 2,352% (28,938 vs 1,180 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; OpenContext is written in JavaScript under MIT. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenContext 6%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K OpenContext ★ 1.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki OpenContext
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Vue JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-16
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 75
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick OpenContext if

  • You want the OpenContext feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenContext fits your workflow better

full OpenContext profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About OpenContext

Give your AI assistant a persistent memory. Stop repeating yourself. Start building smarter. Bring your own coding agent. OpenContext reuses your existing CLI (Codex/Claude/OpenCode) and adds a GUI + built in Skills/tools — no extra agent subscription. 🌐 Website · 📖 Usage Guide · ⬇️ Download Desktop 中文文档 The Problem When you use an AI assistant to build things, context gets lost (across days, repos, chats). You end up re explaining background, repeating decisions, and sometimes the assistant continues with the wrong assumptions. Most tools stop at storage and don't plug into the coding agent you already use. Th…

read the full OpenContext overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or OpenContext more popular?

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars and OpenContext has 1,180. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and OpenContext free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenContext under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and OpenContext?

wiki is written in Vue and OpenContext in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or OpenContext?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,938 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose OpenContext if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.