head to head · open source

wiki vs atomic

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped today. atomic has 1,954 stars, 141 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. wiki leads on adoption by 1,381% (28,938 vs 1,954 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; atomic is written in Rust under MIT. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, atomic 7%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K atomic ★ 2.0K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki atomic
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 2.0K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Vue Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-09
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick atomic if

  • You want the atomic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and atomic fits your workflow better

full atomic profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About atomic

☁️ Atomic Cloud — Atomic, hosted at your own subdomain. Try it out for free. Everything below still self hosts forever. A personal knowledge base that turns markdown notes into a semantically connected, AI augmented knowledge graph. Atomic stores knowledge as atoms — markdown notes that are automatically chunked, embedded, tagged, and linked by semantic similarity. Your atoms can be synthesized into wiki articles, explored on a spatial canvas, and queried through an agentic chat interface. Wiki synthesis — LLM generated articles with inline citations Canvas — view your knowledge on an interactive graph Semantic s…

read the full atomic overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or atomic more popular?

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars and atomic has 1,954. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and atomic free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and atomic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and atomic?

wiki is written in Vue and atomic in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or atomic?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,938 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose atomic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.