head to head · open source
webpack vs Woodpecker CI
webpack has 65,978 GitHub stars, 9,619 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 8,097 stars, 734 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webpack leads on adoption by 715% (65,978 vs 8,097 stars). webpack is written in JavaScript under MIT; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. webpack has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. webpack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webpack | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 66K | ★ 8.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.6K | ⑂ 734 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webpack if
- You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Woodpecker CI if
- You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better
About webpack
[![npm][npm]][npm url] [![node][node]][node url] [![builds1][builds1]][builds1 url] [![dependency review][dependency review]][dependency review url] [![coverage][cover]][cover url] [![PR's welcome][prs]][prs url] webpack Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset. Table of Contents Install Introduction Concepts Contributing Support Current project members TSC (Technical Steering Committee) Core Collaborators Sponsoring Premium Partners Gold Sponsors Silver…
read the full webpack overview →
About Woodpecker CI
Woodpecker Woodpecker is a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility. Installation & Resources Woodpecker can be installed in various ways (see the Installation Instructions) and runs with SQLite as database by default. It requires around 100 MB of RAM (Server) and 30 MB (Agent) at runtime in idle mode. Support You can support the project by becoming a backer on Open Collective or via GitHub Sponsors. Documentation Our documentation can be found at . Translation We have a self hosted Weblate instance at translate.woodpecker ci.org. An overview of the current translation state is available at…
read the full Woodpecker CI overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webpack or Woodpecker CI more popular?
webpack has 65,978 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 8,097. webpack has the larger community by that measure.
Are webpack and Woodpecker CI free?
Both are open source. webpack is licensed under MIT and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webpack and Woodpecker CI?
webpack is written in JavaScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webpack or Woodpecker CI?
Choose webpack if you want the larger community (65,978 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.