head to head · open source
webpack vs Woodpecker CI
webpack has 65,945 GitHub stars, 9,545 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 7,886 stars, 679 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webpack leads on adoption by 736% (65,945 vs 7,886 stars). webpack is written in JavaScript under MIT; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. webpack has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. webpack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webpack | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 66K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.5K | ⑂ 679 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webpack if
- You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Woodpecker CI if
- You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better
About webpack
webpack is an open source module bundler for JavaScript and related assets, distributed under the MIT license and published to npm. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem, where the README describes its main purpose as bundling JavaScript files for use in a browser, while also being capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset. Loaders let modules arrive in many forms — CommonJS, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, images, JSON, CoffeeScript, LESS, or custom formats — and the plugin system extends what the build can do.
read the full webpack overview →
About Woodpecker CI
Woodpecker CI is a continuous integration and continuous delivery engine written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the developer tooling ecosystem around build and deployment automation, and it is distributed as a self hostable server plus one or more agents that execute pipeline work. The project describes itself as a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility, and it is catalogued under topics such as automation, ci, cicd, devops, docker, and kubernetes. Its documentation and plugin directory are hosted at woodpecker ci.org.
read the full Woodpecker CI overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webpack or Woodpecker CI more popular?
webpack has 65,945 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 7,886. webpack has the larger community by that measure.
Are webpack and Woodpecker CI free?
Both are open source. webpack is licensed under MIT and Woodpecker CI under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webpack and Woodpecker CI?
webpack is written in JavaScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webpack or Woodpecker CI?
Choose webpack if you want the larger community (65,945 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.