head to head · open source
mitosis vs web-builder
mitosis has 14,454 GitHub stars, 679 forks, 176 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. web-builder has 585 stars, 99 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. mitosis leads on adoption by 2,371% (14,454 vs 585 stars). mitosis is written in TypeScript under MIT; web-builder is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. mitosis has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, web-builder 17%. mitosis was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (angular, no-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mitosis | web-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 14K | ★ 585 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 679 | ⑂ 99 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mitosis if
- You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick web-builder if
- You want the web-builder feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and web-builder fits your workflow better
About mitosis
Write components once, compile to every framework Overview Mitosis provides a unified development experience across all frameworks, enabling you to build components in a single codebase and compile them to React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Solid, Alpine, Qwik, and more. Using Mitosis, you can: Maintain a consistent design system across multiple frameworks (example) Sync your design systems from Figma to code and publish them to npm across frameworks Avoid the pitfalls of web components by compiling to native framework code PS: We are actively looking for folks interested in becoming contributors to Mitosis. If…
read the full mitosis overview →
About web-builder
信使 Web builder AI 生成UI和工具应用的低代码平台 AI 生成UI和工具应用的低代码平台，国内首款开源的基于 Drupal 作为 Headless 的低代码，基于 TailwindCss，通过拖拽可视化快速构建现代化响应式UI、动态自定义组件、多主题、多语言的网站应用。AI powered UI generation and publishing low code platform, built on TailwindCSS, enabling rapid drag and drop visual creation of modern responsive UIs, dynamic customizable components, multi theme, and multi language web applications. Builder CMS · Web Builder Skills · 信使小程序 · 文档 · 知乎 · Docker 部署 观看演示视频 奥陌陌是已知的第一颗经过太阳系的星际天体，意为"远方信使"。 web builder Builder 预览 Builder Pro 预览 基于AI大模型生成UI、页面和工具应用，欢迎体验。 Web Builder Skills Web Builder Skills 是为 Web Builder 提供的 Claude Code 技能包，覆盖…
read the full web-builder overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mitosis or web-builder more popular?
mitosis has 14,454 GitHub stars and web-builder has 585. mitosis has the larger community by that measure.
Are mitosis and web-builder free?
Both are open source. mitosis is licensed under MIT and web-builder under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mitosis and web-builder?
mitosis is written in TypeScript and web-builder in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mitosis or web-builder?
Choose mitosis if you want the larger community (14,454 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-builder if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.