head to head · open source
LiveKit vs web-builder
LiveKit has 22,027 GitHub stars, 2,529 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. web-builder has 585 stars, 99 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. LiveKit leads on adoption by 3,665% (22,027 vs 585 stars). LiveKit is written in Go under Apache-2.0; web-builder is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. LiveKit has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, web-builder 17%. LiveKit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LiveKit | web-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 585 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.5K | ⑂ 99 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LiveKit if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick web-builder if
- You want the web-builder feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and web-builder fits your workflow better
About LiveKit
LiveKit: Realtime infrastructure for voice, video, and AI agents LiveKit is an open source platform for building voice, video, and physical AI agents. This repository is the LiveKit server: a scalable, distributed WebRTC SFU that moves realtime audio, video, and data between people, devices, and AI models. The SDKs, agents frameworks, and companion services are linked in the table at the bottom of this page. LiveKit's server is written in Go, using the awesome Pion WebRTC implementation. [!IMPORTANT] If you're building Voice AI, LiveKit Agents is the SDK for code first realtime voice agents. STT, LLM, TTS, turn…
read the full LiveKit overview →
About web-builder
信使 Web builder AI 生成UI和工具应用的低代码平台 AI 生成UI和工具应用的低代码平台，国内首款开源的基于 Drupal 作为 Headless 的低代码，基于 TailwindCss，通过拖拽可视化快速构建现代化响应式UI、动态自定义组件、多主题、多语言的网站应用。AI powered UI generation and publishing low code platform, built on TailwindCSS, enabling rapid drag and drop visual creation of modern responsive UIs, dynamic customizable components, multi theme, and multi language web applications. Builder CMS · Web Builder Skills · 信使小程序 · 文档 · 知乎 · Docker 部署 观看演示视频 奥陌陌是已知的第一颗经过太阳系的星际天体，意为"远方信使"。 web builder Builder 预览 Builder Pro 预览 基于AI大模型生成UI、页面和工具应用，欢迎体验。 Web Builder Skills Web Builder Skills 是为 Web Builder 提供的 Claude Code 技能包，覆盖…
read the full web-builder overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LiveKit or web-builder more popular?
LiveKit has 22,027 GitHub stars and web-builder has 585. LiveKit has the larger community by that measure.
Are LiveKit and web-builder free?
Both are open source. LiveKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and web-builder under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LiveKit and web-builder?
LiveKit is written in Go and web-builder in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LiveKit or web-builder?
Choose LiveKit if you want the larger community (22,027 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose web-builder if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.