head to head · open source

Warp vs iTerm 2

Warp has 65,069 GitHub stars, 5,563 forks, 5,218 open issues and last shipped yesterday. iTerm 2 has 18,067 stars, 1,496 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Warp leads on adoption by 260% (65,069 vs 18,067 stars). Warp is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; iTerm 2 is written in Objective-C under GPL-2.0. Warp has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, iTerm 2 8%. Warp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Warp ★ 65K iTerm 2 ★ 18K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Warp iTerm 2
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 18K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Rust Objective-C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.6K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Warp if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Warp profile →

pick iTerm 2 if

  • You want the iTerm 2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Objective-C
  • You evaluated both and iTerm 2 fits your workflow better

full iTerm 2 profile →

About Warp

Warp is an agentic development environment, born out of the terminal, built for developers and teams who want a modern shell on Linux and macOS with AI coding agents working inside it.

read the full Warp overview →

About iTerm 2

iTerm 2 is a terminal emulator for macOS, written in Objective C and licensed under GPL 2.0. It replaces the default macOS terminal with an interface for shells, tabs, panes, and remote sessions. The project lives in the macOS developer tools ecosystem, where command line work, SSH sessions, tmux sessions, and shell history need one persistent client.

read the full iTerm 2 overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

alacritty vs warp warp vs ghostty warp vs zellij warp vs kitty alacritty vs ghostty alacritty vs zellij alacritty vs kitty ghostty vs zellij opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Terminals projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Terminals field.

Warp vs Alacritty Warp vs Ghostty Warp vs Zellij Warp vs Kitty Warp vs WezTerm Warp vs WaveTerm

Frequently asked questions

Is Warp or iTerm 2 more popular?

Warp has 65,069 GitHub stars and iTerm 2 has 18,067. Warp has the larger community by that measure.

Are Warp and iTerm 2 free?

Both are open source. Warp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and iTerm 2 under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Warp and iTerm 2?

Warp is written in Rust and iTerm 2 in Objective-C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Warp or iTerm 2?

Choose Warp if you want the larger community (65,069 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose iTerm 2 if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.