head to head · open source

vuls vs tenzir

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars, 1,243 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tenzir has 758 stars, 109 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vuls leads on adoption by 1,518% (12,263 vs 758 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; tenzir is written in C++ under BSD-3-Clause. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, tenzir 14%. tenzir was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vuls ★ 12K tenzir ★ 758 category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

vuls tenzir
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 758
License GPL-3.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 109
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vuls if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vuls profile →

pick tenzir if

  • You want the tenzir feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and tenzir fits your workflow better

full tenzir profile →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

About tenzir

Tenzir is a data pipeline engine for security teams — written in C++ and released under the BSD 3 Clause licence — that lets SOC analysts, detection engineers, and incident responders collect, transform, enrich, and route security telemetry instead of only storing it.

read the full tenzir overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

vuls vs PayloadsAllTheThings vuls vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vuls vs ProjectDiscovery vuls vs pentagi vuls vs osv-scanner vuls vs Nettacker vuls vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool vuls vs afrog vuls vs Tracecat vuls vs airgorah

Frequently asked questions

Is vuls or tenzir more popular?

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars and tenzir has 758. vuls has the larger community by that measure.

Are vuls and tenzir free?

Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and tenzir under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vuls and tenzir?

vuls is written in Go and tenzir in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vuls or tenzir?

Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,263 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tenzir if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.