head to head · open source
vuls vs enum4linux-ng
vuls has 12,344 GitHub stars, 1,248 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. enum4linux-ng has 1,692 stars, 155 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. vuls leads on adoption by 630% (12,344 vs 1,692 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; enum4linux-ng is written in Python under GPL-3.0. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, enum4linux-ng 9%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (security, security-audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vuls | enum4linux-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-02-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 155 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vuls if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick enum4linux-ng if
- You want the enum4linux-ng feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and enum4linux-ng fits your workflow better
About vuls
Vuls: VULnerability Scanner Vulnerability scanner for Linux/FreeBSD, agent less, written in Go. Twitter: @vuls en Abstract For a system administrator, having to perform security vulnerability analysis and software update on a daily basis can be a burden. To avoid downtime in a production environment, it is common for a system administrator to choose not to use the automatic update option provided by the package manager and to perform update manually. This leads to the following problems. The system administrator will have to constantly watch out for any new vulnerabilities in NVD (National Vulnerability…
About enum4linux-ng
enum4linux ng A next generation version of enum4linux enum4linux ng.py is a rewrite of Mark Lowe's (former Portcullis Labs now Cisco CX Security Labs) enum4linux.pl, a tool for enumerating information from Windows and Samba systems, aimed for security professionals and CTF players. The tool is mainly a wrapper around the Samba tools nmblookup , net , rpcclient and smbclient . I made it for educational purposes for myself and to overcome issues with enum4linux.pl. It has the same functionality as the original tool (though it does some things differently). Other than the original tool it parses all output of the…
read the full enum4linux-ng overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vuls or enum4linux-ng more popular?
vuls has 12,344 GitHub stars and enum4linux-ng has 1,692. vuls has the larger community by that measure.
Are vuls and enum4linux-ng free?
Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and enum4linux-ng under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between vuls and enum4linux-ng?
vuls is written in Go and enum4linux-ng in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vuls or enum4linux-ng?
Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,344 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose enum4linux-ng if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.