head to head · open source

vite vs zeabur

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zeabur has 681 stars, 101 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vite leads on adoption by 12,068% (82,861 vs 681 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; zeabur is written in HTML under MPL-2.0. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, zeabur 15%. zeabur was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K zeabur ★ 681 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite zeabur
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 681
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 101
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick zeabur if

  • You want the zeabur feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and zeabur fits your workflow better

full zeabur profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About zeabur

Zeabur is a platform as a service for developers, small teams, and AI agent driven workflows that turns source code into running services through one click deployment, without requiring DevOps expertise.

read the full zeabur overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or zeabur more popular?

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and zeabur has 681. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and zeabur free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and zeabur under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and zeabur?

vite is written in TypeScript and zeabur in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or zeabur?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zeabur if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.