head to head · open source

vite vs tsuru

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tsuru has 5,310 stars, 551 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. vite leads on adoption by 1,460% (82,861 vs 5,310 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; tsuru is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, tsuru 10%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K tsuru ★ 5.3K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite tsuru
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 5.3K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 551
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick tsuru if

  • You want the tsuru feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and tsuru fits your workflow better

full tsuru profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About tsuru

tsuru is an open source, extensible Platform as a Service written in Go and released under the BSD 3 Clause license. It lives in the cloud native and DevOps ecosystem alongside Docker, Kubernetes, and the wider container tooling world, and it has been developed in public for roughly fifteen years. Rather than asking developers to think about servers, tsuru presents a platform on which applications are deployed as units and managed through a single command line client. The project describes itself as extensible, which reflects a design where the set of supported runtimes and backing services can be grown rather th…

read the full tsuru overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or tsuru more popular?

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and tsuru has 5,310. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and tsuru free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and tsuru under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and tsuru?

vite is written in TypeScript and tsuru in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or tsuru?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tsuru if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.