head to head · open source

vite vs nuxt

vite has 82,868 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped today. nuxt has 60,874 stars, 5,801 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vite leads on adoption by 36% (82,868 vs 60,874 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; nuxt is written in TypeScript under MIT. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, nuxt 10%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K nuxt ★ 61K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite nuxt
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 61K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 5.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick nuxt if

  • You want the nuxt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nuxt fits your workflow better

full nuxt profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About nuxt

Nuxt is a free and open source full stack framework for building web applications and websites with Vue.js. It lives in the Vue ecosystem and is written in TypeScript under the MIT license, with the repository hosted on GitHub and the project documented at nuxt.com. The framework describes itself as offering an intuitive and extendable way to create type safe, performant and production grade full stack applications, and it has been developed over roughly ten years, with the most recent push to the repository recorded in September 2026.

read the full nuxt overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or nuxt more popular?

vite has 82,868 GitHub stars and nuxt has 60,874. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and nuxt free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and nuxt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and nuxt?

vite is written in TypeScript and nuxt in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or nuxt?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,868 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nuxt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.