head to head · open source

vite vs farm

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. farm has 5,588 stars, 190 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. vite leads on adoption by 1,383% (82,861 vs 5,588 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; farm is written in Rust under MIT. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, farm 3%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (build-tool, frontend, hmr, vite), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K farm ★ 5.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite farm
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 5.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-14
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 190
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick farm if

  • You want the farm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and farm fits your workflow better

full farm profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About farm

Farm is a web build tool written in Rust and distributed under the MIT license. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside bundlers such as webpack and Vite, and it is designed to be compatible with Vite so that existing plugins can be reused. The project is hosted on GitHub, has reached a 1.0 stable release that the README describes as production ready, and ships with documentation and an online playground at farmfe.org.

read the full farm overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or farm more popular?

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and farm has 5,588. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and farm free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and farm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and farm?

vite is written in TypeScript and farm in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or farm?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose farm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.