head to head · open source

vite vs erlang.mk

vite has 82,868 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped today. erlang.mk has 587 stars, 237 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. vite leads on adoption by 14,017% (82,868 vs 587 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; erlang.mk is written in Makefile under ISC. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, erlang.mk 40%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K erlang.mk ★ 587 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite erlang.mk
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 587
License MIT ISC
Written in TypeScript Makefile
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 237
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick erlang.mk if

  • You want the erlang.mk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Makefile
  • You evaluated both and erlang.mk fits your workflow better

full erlang.mk profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About erlang.mk

= Erlang.mk A build tool for Erlang that just works. guide] Embrace the power and simplicity of Makefiles. [source,make] PROJECT = webchat DEPS = cowboy dep cowboy commit = 2.8.0 include erlang.mk started] Tested and supported on FreeBSD, OSX] and Get help! server].

read the full erlang.mk overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or erlang.mk more popular?

vite has 82,868 GitHub stars and erlang.mk has 587. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and erlang.mk free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and erlang.mk under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and erlang.mk?

vite is written in TypeScript and erlang.mk in Makefile. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or erlang.mk?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,868 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose erlang.mk if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.