head to head · open source

vite vs cuber-gem

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cuber-gem has 713 stars, 27 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. vite leads on adoption by 11,521% (82,861 vs 713 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; cuber-gem is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, cuber-gem 4%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K cuber-gem ★ 713 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite cuber-gem
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 713
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-04-12
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 27
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick cuber-gem if

  • You want the cuber-gem feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and cuber-gem fits your workflow better

full cuber-gem profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About cuber-gem

Cuber is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Ruby based automation tool that packages and deploys applications written in any language or framework onto Kubernetes from a roughly ten line Cuberfile and a single cuber deploy command, aimed at developers and small teams who want the simplicity of a platform as a service without its cost or provider lock in.

read the full cuber-gem overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx webpack vs appwrite opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox vite vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or cuber-gem more popular?

vite has 82,861 GitHub stars and cuber-gem has 713. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and cuber-gem free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and cuber-gem under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and cuber-gem?

vite is written in TypeScript and cuber-gem in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or cuber-gem?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,861 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cuber-gem if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.