head to head · open source
vite vs Ceedling
vite has 82,868 GitHub stars, 8,745 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped today. Ceedling has 851 stars, 273 forks, 248 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vite leads on adoption by 9,638% (82,868 vs 851 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; Ceedling is written in Ruby under MIT. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Ceedling 32%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vite | Ceedling | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 83K | ★ 851 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 273 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vite if
- You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ceedling if
- You want the Ceedling feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and Ceedling fits your workflow better
About vite
Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.
About Ceedling
Ceedling ======== Ceedling 1.1.8 is the latest and greatest. See [ Release Notes ][release notes], Changelog , [ Breaking Changes ][breaking changes], and [ Known Issues ][known issues]. See 🚀 Getting Started for installation and new project set up. New goodies in 1.1.x: A [Partial][partials docs] allows a test to mix mocked and real functions from the same source module in a single test file and enables testing of static and inline functions without modifying source code. Ceedling is now complemented by a full, searchable [documentation site][ceedling docs site] available both online and as a local bundle expor…
read the full Ceedling overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vite or Ceedling more popular?
vite has 82,868 GitHub stars and Ceedling has 851. vite has the larger community by that measure.
Are vite and Ceedling free?
Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and Ceedling under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between vite and Ceedling?
vite is written in TypeScript and Ceedling in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vite or Ceedling?
Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,868 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Ceedling if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.