head to head · open source

vite vs bun

vite has 82,905 GitHub stars, 8,759 forks, 767 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bun has 4,974 stars, 306 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. vite leads on adoption by 1,567% (82,905 vs 4,974 stars). vite is written in TypeScript under MIT; bun is written in Go under BSD-2-Clause. vite has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, bun 6%. vite was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vite ★ 83K bun ★ 5.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

vite bun
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 5.0K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-21
Forks ⑂ 8.8K ⑂ 306
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vite if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vite profile →

pick bun if

  • You want the bun feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and bun fits your workflow better

full bun profile →

About vite

Vite is a build tool for modern web projects, distributed as a set of npm packages and licensed under MIT. It is written in TypeScript and lives in the JavaScript and frontend tooling ecosystem, where it sits alongside the bundlers and dev servers that compile application source into browser ready assets. The project describes itself as next generation frontend tooling and has been maintained for roughly six years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026.

read the full vite overview →

About bun

Bun is a lightweight, SQL first object relational mapper for Go that gives backend engineers type safe access to PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, MSSQL, SQLite, and Oracle from one database agnostic codebase.

read the full bun overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs vite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

vite vs webpack vite vs Appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs esbuild vite vs Harness vite vs Dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx vite vs NocoBase vite vs gradle vite vs rspack vite vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is vite or bun more popular?

vite has 82,905 GitHub stars and bun has 4,974. vite has the larger community by that measure.

Are vite and bun free?

Both are open source. vite is licensed under MIT and bun under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vite and bun?

vite is written in TypeScript and bun in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vite or bun?

Choose vite if you want the larger community (82,905 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bun if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.